翻译下面一段话

显示全部楼层 · 2007-3-28 20:33:31

Our country criminal law implementation responsibility for an offensewas proud the principle, the criminal offender died, escaped or loseswhen the lawsuit capacity has lost the penalty object, was unable torealize the criminal law goal, investigates the legal responsibilityalready non- practical significance, therefore the court the suspect,time the accused person vacancy lawsuit case stops or the terminationtries. The author thinks this procedure although looked resemblesreasonably, however is often disadvantageous fairly in the judicialpractice to the lawsuit is also disadvantageous to the lawsuitefficiency, advocated in the absorption model overseas criminalprosecution about the trial by default system advanced legislation,unifies the our country concrete national condition and the judicialpractice establishment with my the criminal activity trial by defaultsystem which society develops adapts.

千问 · 2007-3-28 20:33:31

My own responsibility to implement the principle of the criminal law, criminal death litigation or loss of the ability to kill a penalty when it lost the target impossible to achieve the purpose of the criminal law. held criminally moot, the court will therefore suspect, the defendant at the lack of suspension or termination of the trial proceedings. I believe that such an approach, while seemingly reasonable, However, in practice the judiciary is often not conducive to the efficiency of the proceedings is not conducive to fair proceedings. stand in absorbing foreign advanced system of criminal trials in absentia on legislation China\'s specific national conditions and judicial practice and the establishment of social development compatible with the absence of the criminal justice system.