|
您好，我的答案为：XU Tong-qiang Beijing University in his masterpiece, "On Language" (Northeast Normal University Press, 1997) explicitly advocate the "word" for "word", it would be rightly called "the vocabulary, learn vocabulary," a? Clang advocate Xu Tongmo from the "Indo-European perspective" of the constraints, emphasizing the position back to Chinese, "in Chinese eyes to observe the structure of Chinese." It advocates the "word" for "word." Its definition of the word is: "language to justify the structure of the smallest units." Qiang Xu Tongmo many perspectives, it is enlightening, and we appreciate very much. In particular, the language of his "self-organization" theory, advocated by my "self-regulatory function of language" is basically the same, "Self-organization of" is "self-regulatory function." But his use of "word" for "word" idea, we really can not agree, but it is very difficult to understand, I do not understand why he did so. We called the "word, vocabulary, vocabulary learning", we do not support "the word vocabulary, learn vocabulary," the idea. I They advocate strict distinction between "word" and "word", to distinguish between spoken and written language. The academic vocabulary of the few scholars to come out in support of XU Tong-qiang, and this is very simple, if the "words" are not, and where to's "Lexicology", then "terms of Jurists" was also what? Since the idea of Xu Tongmo Victor academic Lexicology almost no one accepted, we will be more than that here.谢谢 |
